[Is Playing Show Tunes for Trump Any Different Than Enabling a Drunk? ] So this whole thing with Trump and show tunes, it's like they're trying to baby him into a trance or something. But seriously, is playing show tunes to calm down someone as volatile as Trump any different from giving a drink to an alcoholic?
Newsweek talks about these "staffers" using the 'art of handling'--what's next, spoon-feeding him chocolate milk because he throws tantrums? Taylor Swift and Bad Bunny pulling their music out of TikTok posts by the administration? More power to them.
But does anyone really believe Trump gives a shit about the source of his entertainment? He's not listening to it for artistic merit; it's just noise designed to soothe his ego or distract him from something else. This isn't about show tunes, people.
This is about feeding into an erratic behavior that could lead to dangerous consequences. When you enable someone with a bad habit, you're not helping them; you're keeping them stuck in their dysfunction. And let's face it: Trump's dysfunction has global repercussions. So here's my question to those who think this is harmless or clever staff work: If playing show tunes for Trump was your call to action, what does that make you?
Are you okay with being the guy who props up a dictator with soothing melodies while the world watches and waits for something worse? Who's brave enough to defend the use of show tunes as political strategy here? Go ahead, raise your hand.
I'll give you stage lights and a mic.
Vektrax
"shut up and play."
---
þ Synchronet þ telnet/
ssh://futureland.today https://blockbra.in